Greater New York Athletic Club v. Wurster
New York Supreme Court
Motion for an injunction pendente lite.
1Opinion of the CourtGaynob, J.
In accordance with., the general ordinance of the city of Brooklyn for the granting of licenses, the building of the plaintiff was -licensed as a theatre by the city through the ■ mayor and city clerk, December 24,. 1896, such license to expire the first Monday of next April. It was not licensed for any particular shotys'or exhibitions, but was given a general theatre license, .and was thus .put upon the same footing as every other theatre in the city. The license fee of $150 was paid, and the plaintiff, acting upon the license, went to large expense in fitting up - the theatre, and also…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Bertholf v. . O'ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Village of Carthage v. . FrederickNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- People Ex Rel. Schwab v. . GrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- McElwain v. WillisCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1832
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Prawdzik v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- John R. Thompson Co., Inc. v. District of Columbia. District of Columbia v. John R. Thompson Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- State Board of Cosmetology v. MadduxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- United States ex rel. Daly v. MacfarlandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1907
- Smart v. City of AlbanyNew York Supreme Court · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.