Legal Opinion

United States v. Daniel Muratella

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 13, 2016No. 16-1265PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. ■

Daniel C, Muratella appeals the decision of the district court 1 overruling his objection to the Government’s filing of an information pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § .851, arguing that this filing constituted vindictive prosecution. Because we conclude that this claim is foreclosed by Muratella’s unconditional guilty plea, we affirm.

I

In November 2014, a grand jury returned an indictment charging Muratella with one count of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). On April 20, 2015, the Government e-mailed Muratella’s attorney a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Dwight Arnold Camp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. Ronald Frank VaughanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  4. Max Weisberg v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Ascension Soriano-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matthew Foy v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2022
  2. United States v. Bryan GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. James ReedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Patrick BrigaudinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. Ronald DowneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API