United States v. Daniel Muratella
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. ■
Daniel C, Muratella appeals the decision of the district court 1 overruling his objection to the Government’s filing of an information pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § .851, arguing that this filing constituted vindictive prosecution. Because we conclude that this claim is foreclosed by Muratella’s unconditional guilty plea, we affirm.
I
In November 2014, a grand jury returned an indictment charging Muratella with one count of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). On April 20, 2015, the Government e-mailed Muratella’s attorney a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dwight Arnold Camp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Ronald Frank VaughanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Max Weisberg v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Ascension Soriano-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matthew Foy v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2022
- United States v. Bryan GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. James ReedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Patrick BrigaudinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Ronald DowneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019