Legal Opinion
United States v. Dago
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 30, 2006No. 04-1184PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
In this case, George Erman Dago appeals from the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition for habeas relief by the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. We conclude that the district court’s failure to instruct the jury in Dago’s 1992 trial in accordance with the subsequent holding of Richardson v. United States, 526 U.S. 813, 815, 119 S.Ct. 1707, 143 L.Ed.2d 985 (1999) (holding that a jury must unanimously agree on which specific violations make up the “continuing series of violations” that underlie a continuing criminal enterprise conviction), is…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Lawrence v. BrankerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Sines v. WilnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Triandus Tabb v. Tim ChristiansonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Chang HongCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Terrence SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.