Legal Opinion
Adam Rosenfelt v. Mississippi Development Authority
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 2018No. 2017-CA-01120-SCTPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ISHEE, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:
¶ 1. This is a contract dispute between Adam Rosenfelt, a film producer, and the Mississippi Development Authority (MDA). Rosenfelt claims the MDA promised loan guarantees so he could make movies in Mississippi. He made one film, which was not financially successful, and the MDA refused to guarantee the loan for his next project. Rosenfelt now claims the MDA breached a contract with him, personally. We conclude that the actual documents show that any agreement was between the MDA and one or more LLCs, not Rosenfelt personally, and Rosenfelt cannot contradict the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Painter's Mill Grille, LLC v. Howard BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Pursue Energy Corp. v. PerkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Victor Schaffer v. Universal Rundle Corporation, Universal Rundle Corporation v. Victor SchafferCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Schmidt v. Catholic Diocese of BiloxiMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Billy Ray Gibson a/k/a Billy Gibson v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2026
- Board of Aldermen of The Town of Tutwiler, Mississippi v. State of Mississippi, Office of the State AuditorCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2023
- Caleb Crabtree and Adriane Crabtree as Assignees of the Claims of Casey Cotton v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 2025
- Carl Rufus Walters a/k/a Carl Walters v. Dain Gates and Evelyn DanielCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2023
- Designer Custom Homes, LLC v. U.S. Coating Specialties & Supplies, LLCCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2024
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.