Legal Opinion
Hespe v. Corning Glass Works, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 1, 1930No. 58PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The appellants, Corning Glass Works, Inc., a manufacturer, and the Taylor Instrument Companies, a distributor, appeal from a decree which holds patents Nos. 1,561,925 and 1,561,926, valid and infringed by the manufacture and sale of their thermometer tubing. The first of these was granted on an application filed January 10, 1922, and the second January 26, 1925; the latter is said to be a continuation or division of the first. Both have been sustained as to their two claims.
The claims of the first, No. 1,561,925, are:
1. A thermometer comprising a glass tube having a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Spalding v. John WanamakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hookless Fastener Co. v. GreenbergDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1937
- Hespe v. Corning Glass WorksDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1937