Blodgett v. Scott
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Imperial County denying a new trial. Franklin J. Cole, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.
The action was sought to be maintained under the forcible detainer act. The complaint alleges plaintiff’s possession and right of possession of and to a certain eighty acre tract of land on the date stated and for a long time prior thereto, entry without right thereon by defendant and the subsequent withholding of possession from plaintiff, together with service of notice to vacate and surrender possession. The answer denied that plaintiff was in the lawful possession of the entire tract at the date stated, and denied the entry and withholding of possession without right. This answer was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holmes v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Doll v. GoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Higgins v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
- Leroux v. MurdockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- Frey v. VignierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by2 opinions
- Church v. BlakesleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
- Cook v. Suburban Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912