Bowling v. Helm

OPINION of the Court, by

Judge Bibb.

The objection to the report of survey, for want of notice, was jj answered by shewing that the defendant had removed beyond the limits of the commonwealth. The plaintiff was not bound to regard the information given to him, that Shannon was the landlord. Shannon should have made himself a defendant to the suit, instead of Bowling, if he was interested as landlord : he was un-*89rJer a greater obligation to take notice of and respect the judicial proceedings in court, than the plaintiff was to take notice, of the private relation of landlord and tenant. Bowline:…