State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Smith, J., granting a motion for a new trial, after a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $9,211.87.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
The plaintiff appeals from an order of the court below granting a new trial after a trial by jury and a verdict for plaintiff. The case was here on a former appeal. See 62 Minn. 99, 64 N. W. 81. Appellant contends that there was no error committed on. the trial, and that there was ample evidence to sustain the verdict.
1. The action is for the conversion of saw logs cut on the land of the state, and the only conflict of evidence on the trial was as to the-quality and value of the logs so converted. Although we feel that the verdict is supported by substantial evidence, yet the evidence…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wood v. CullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
- Nelson v. Village of West DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Lane v. DaytonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mohr v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Ginsberg v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Trustees of Dartmouth College v. International Paper Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1904
- Strasser v. StabeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- O'Neil v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.