Legal Opinion

Graham v. Van Wyck

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1852PublishedCited by 12 opinions

This was a partition suit. A sale of the premises being necessary, a decree was now moved for.

1Opinion of the CourtBarculo, J.

The rights of the parties depend somewhat upon the effect which is to be given to a deed executed by Car*532oline Van Wyck, on the 4th day of March, 1850. By that instrument she, for the consideration of one dollar, granted and released, so far as she could, to her husband, Theodore Van Wyck, all her dower right in and to “ all the real estate” owned by her said husband.. That this deed was inoperative at common law, is too plain to require discussion. If it has any vitality, it derives it from the act “ for the more effectual protection of the property of married women,” passed April 7, 1848. By…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Winans v. . PeeblesNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Perkins v. PerkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Kelso v. TaborNew York Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Crain v. CavanaNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  5. In re the Estate of ShulenburgNew York Surrogate's Court · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API