Legal Opinion

United States v. Gamboa-Cano

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 31, 1975No. 74-2652PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We have considered the several assignments of error by appellant in this case relating to the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the jury’s verdict of guilty, to the asserted involuntariness of the defendant’s confession, to the conduct of the judge during the trial as having been prejudicial to the defendant, and to the alleged failure of the trial judge to comply with the principle of Dorszynski v. United States, 418 U.S. 424, 94 S.Ct. 3042, 41 L.Ed.2d 855 (1974), relative to the necessity of an explicit finding that defendant would not benefit from sentencing under the Youth…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Edward Rodriguez, A/K/A Rick, Thomas J. Albernaz, Peter Smigowski, and William John MartinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Sherod William Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Fernando Perez Bustillo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Edward Rodriguez, A/K/A Rick, Thomas J. Albernaz, Peter Smigowski, and William John MartinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API