Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 16, 1988No. 87-505Published

1ConcurrenceJustice White

I agree with the Court that, as a general matter, “[fjederal forum non conveniens principles simply cannot determine whether [state] courts, which operate under a broad ‘open-courts’ mandate, [will] consider themselves an appropriate forum” for a federal litigant’s lawsuit. Ante, at 148. Consequently, in diversity cases — for example — a district court’s dismissal on forum non conveniens grounds cannot serve as a basis for a later injunction if the plaintiff subsequently brings the same action in a state court.

But, as the Court recognizes, this case involves the special area of federal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shereen Ramona Zipfel, Individually and as Administratrix of Ian Charles Zipfel, Deceased v. Halliburton Company Atlantic Richfield Company Crowley Maritime Corporation Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling, Inc. Continental Oil Company (Conoco, Inc.) Hudson Bay Oil & Gas Company, Ltd. Hudbay Oil, Ltd. (Indonesia) Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling, Ptd, Ltd. Hudbay Oil (Malacca), Ltd. Dome Petroleum, Ltd. Dome Petroleum Corporation Arco Oil and Gas Corporation Pt Airfast Services Indonesia and Exquisitor Helicopter Corporation, Ten Fong Craig, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of William Henry Craig, Deceased v. Atlantic Richfield Company Crowley Maritime Corporation Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling, Inc. Continental Oil Company (Conoco, Inc.) Hudson Bay Oil & Gas Company, Ltd. Hudbay Oil, Ltd. (Indonesia) Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling, S.A. Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling, Pte, Ltd. Hudbay Oil (Malacca), Ltd. Dome Petroleum Ltd. Dome Petroleum Corporation Pt Airfast Services Indonesia and Exquisitor Helicopter Corporation, Defendants- Vyner Gerard Albuquerque v. Oceaneering International, Inc. Oceaneering International, Sdn, Bhd. Halliburton Company Atlantic Richfield Company Crowley Maritime Corporation, Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling, Inc. Continental Oil Company (Conoco, Inc.) Hudson Bay Oil & Gas Company, Ltd. Hudbay Oil, Ltd. (Indonesia) Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling, Pte, Ltd. Hudbay Oil (Malacca), Ltd. Dome Petroleum, Ltd. Dome Petroleum Corporation Arco Oil and Gas Corporation Pt Airfast Services Indonesia and Exquisitor Helicopter Corporation, Chan Luck Chee v. McClelland Engineers, Inc. McClelland Engineers, S.A. McClelland Engineers Sdn. Bhd. Halliburton Company Atlantic Richfield Company Crowley Maritime Corporation Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling, Inc. Continental Oil Company (Conoco, Inc.) Hudson Bay Oil & Gas Company, Ltd. Hudbay Oil, Ltd. (Indonesia) Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling, S.A. Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling, Pte, Ltd. Dome Petroleum, Ltd. Dome Petroleum Corporation Arco Oil and Gas Corporation Pt Airfast Services Indonesia and Exquisitor Helicopter Corporation, Patrick Paul Grunke v. Atlantic Richfield Company Crowley Maritime Corporation Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling, Inc. Continental Oil Company (Conoco, Inc.) Hudson Bay Oil & Gas Company, Ltd. Hudbay Oil, Ltd. (Indonesia) Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling, S.A. Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling Pte, Ltd. Hudbay Oil (Malacca), Ltd. Dome Petroleum, Ltd. Dome Petroleum Corporation Arco Oil and Gas Corporation Pt Airfast Services Indonesia and Exquisitor Helicopter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API