Legal Opinion

Automobile Underwriters of America v. Radford

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 24, 1927No. 9700Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

Appellees, among other grounds urged, contend that this court erred in reversing and remanding this cause because appellant did not file a motion for new trial in the trial court in compliance with subdivisions 29 and 30 of article 2092, R. O. S. 1925, applicable to civil district courts in counties having two or more district courts with civil jursdiction only, whose terms continue for three months or longer.

In passing upon this question, subdivision 28 of said article 2092 should be considered in connection with subdivisions 29 and 30, supra. By the terms of said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dittman v. Model Baking Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. First Nat. Bank of Ft. Worth v. HenwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Head v. AltmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Dumas v. EasleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API