Legal Opinion

Frohman v. Payton

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion by plaintiff for an injunction pendente lite.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The plaintiff, a well-known theatrical manager, purchased from Edmond Rostand, the composer, the sole right in this country to his celebrated play “ L’Aiglon,” and caused it to be translated and adapted for America. He organized a company for its production, and after the investment of a large amount of money placed the play upon the stage, where it has achieved unusual success. The defendant, the proprietor of a theater in the borough of Brooklyn, has announced the production of a play in his theater entitled “ L’Aiglon.” It is conceded that the play the defendant proposes to produce is not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hier v. . AbrahamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Arnheim v. ArnheimNew York Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Frohman v. MillerThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Jackson v. Universal International Pictures Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Dickey v. Mutual Film Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Klaw v. General Film Co.New York Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Manners v. Triangle Film Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API