Legal Opinion

Mattson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 31, 1908No. Nos. 15,446—(177)Published

Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover $1,995.95-damages for personal injuries. The case was tried before Cant, J.,. who directed the jury to return a verdict in favor of defendant. Prom an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries, in which a verdict was directed for defendant, and plaintiff appealed from an order denying a new trial.

The facts are as follows: Plaintiff was engaged with other laborers, in defendant’s employ in the work of moving track material from one-point in 'defendant’s yards in Duluth to another some distance away. The work was in charge of a foreman, and consisted in loading the-material upon a small push car in general use for similar purposes in railroad yards, and then pushing it to the point of unloading. To-thus move the car back and forward,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boyer v. Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Dixon v. Union IronworksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Hermann v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Hagglund v. St. Hilaire Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. McKenna v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API