Davis v. Cilley
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
This bill in equity was heard upon the bill, answer and proofs, and the pleadings and facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBellows, J.
The bill is brought to set aside an award, upon the ground that the arbitrators, intending to decide according to law, mistook it, and allowed the defendant large sums which were not due him; and also upon' the ground of fraud, partiality and corruption in the arbitrators, or one of them. Among other things the bill alleges that the sum of $2,246.08 was so allowed for an amount paid to Cross & Topliff upon a $2,000 note, made by the plaintiff and defendant as partners; when in fact the defendant paid only $1,000, which was received in full payment and discharge of the note; and that this was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Underhill v. Van CortlandtNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
- Martin v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1816
- Herrick v. BlairNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
- Tex. & Pac. R'y Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1884
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rand v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990