Legal Opinion

S. F. Bowser & Co. v. Schwartz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Douglas county: FRANK A. Ross, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTimlin, J.

In this action for a balance due on notes given for tbe purchase price of a clothes-eleaning outfit and extra tank, a verdict was directed for the plaintiff. The plaintiff was a foreign corporation and not licensed to do business in the state of Wisconsin, but the merchandise in question when sold was in Indiana, where the plaintiff was domiciled, and thereafter shipped to the defendants at Superior, Wisconsin, pursuant to such sale. The contract was therefore a transaction of interstate commerce and valid notwithstanding the provisions of sec. 1770b, Stats. F. A. Patrick & Co. v. Deschamp,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. F. A. Patrick & Co. v. DeschampWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Phœnix Nursery Co. v. TrostelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  2. General Talking Pictures Corp. v. SheaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  3. Bowser v. SaviduskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Regina Co. v. ToynbeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API