Legal Opinion

In re New York, West Shore & Buffalo Railway Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1882PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerwin, J.

The statute upon which this proceeding is based requires that the petition of the company shall state certain things, and that upon its presentment to the court any party in interest may show cause against granting the prayer of the petition, and may disprove any of the facts alleged in it, and that the court shall hear the proofs and allegations of the parties, and if no sufficient cause is shown shall appoint commissioners to ascertain and appraise the compensation to be made. If the petition does not state the facts required by the statute to be stated, an objection in that regard can be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of MarshNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Matter of P.P. and C.I.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. R. R. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Hooker v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Durham & Northern Railroad v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  5. County of Sullivan v. Case, New York County Courts1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API