Legal Opinion

Holland v. Krawski

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided March 7, 1962No. File 120549Published

1Opinion of the CourtKlau, J.

Tbe defendants have served the plaintiff Irene Holland with a notice that they will take her deposition on March 19, 1962, to be used in the trial, and state in said notice that the deposition is to be taken on the ground that this plaintiff is an adverse party within the meaning of §■ 52-178 of the General Statutes, as amended. It is agreed that the status of the plaintiff does not fall within the provisions of §§ 52-148, 52-149 and 52-152 of the General Statutes, which set forth the prerequisites for the taking of a deposition of a witness or party to a civil action. The plaintiff lives in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bergner v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  2. Buckingham v. BarnumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
  3. Levy v. HeymanConnecticut Superior Court · 1954
  4. Murray v. SenatroConnecticut Superior Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API