Legal Opinion

Sterling v. Brahms

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBenjamin Brenner, J.

Plaintiff moves for a mandatory injunction pendente lite requiring defendant to restore to plaintiff certain papers and documents which the latter requires as an attorney at law in the prosecution of a proceeding now at the eve of trial in the United States District Court. In substance, it is asserted that plaintiff engaged defendant to conduct an investigation concerning the matter involved in the proceeding in the District Court; that defendant took into his possession from plaintiff’s files exhibits, documents, interrogatories and reports in addition to other papers pertaining to said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scott Shoe Machinery Co. v. BroakerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Park Place-Dodge Corp. v. CollinsNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Graham v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Ming v. SimpkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API