Legal Opinion

Demopoulos v. the Title Insurance Company

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1956No. 6051PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGHEE, Justice.

The defendant appeals from judgment rendered against it in an action on a policy of title insurance. The facts out of which the controversy arose are not in dispute. A mortgagor (not a party in this case) represented to the plaintiff-mortgagee that he was mortgaging an improved piece of real estate worth approximately $15,000, when in fact he mortgaged an adjoining unimproved lot worth $1,200. The amount loaned under the mortgage by plaintiff was $8,500 and such was the amount of the title insurance 'policy issued by defendant to plaintiff insuring plaintiff’s interest under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. New York Title InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Narberth Building & Loan Ass'n v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Whiteman v. Merion Title & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blackhawk Production Credit Ass'n v. Chicago Title InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Allen v. Allen Title CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Hartman v. ShambaughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  4. First Federal Savings And Loan Association Of Fargo, North Dakota v. Transamerica Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. Associated Bank, N.A. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API