Waters v. Pool
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County. E. E. Gaddis, Judge. The complaint averred that the lands are situated in Yolo county, and are particularly described as appears by the exhibit thereto attached, marked Exhibit “A,” and made part of the complaint, which consisted of a plat and accompanying field notes showing that the land described was situated in the peninsula made by the bend in the former course of the Sacramento river, in the northwest quarter…
Read the full summary
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County. E. E. Gaddis, Judge. The complaint averred that the lands are situated in Yolo county, and are particularly described as appears by the exhibit thereto attached, marked Exhibit “A,” and made part of the complaint, which consisted of a plat and accompanying field notes showing that the land described was situated in the peninsula made by the bend in the former course of the Sacramento river, in the northwest quarter of section 19, township 11 north, range 3 east, Mt. Diablo meridian, and contained twenty-seven and twenty-eight…
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This action was brought in Yolo county to quiet title to a twenty-seven acre tract of land located near the Sacramento river. In the complaint the land was described as a certain part of the northwest quarter of section 19 in township 11 north, range 3 east, Mt. Diablo meridian. On the trial defendant (appellant here) objected to the talcing of any testimony because it appeared from the complaint that the land in controversy was situated in Sutter county, "and the action was not commenced in Sutter county but in Yolo county.” The objection was overruled and appellant excepted. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nebraska v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Missouri v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Rogers v. CadyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rice v. SchubertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Cohen v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Parish of Caddo v. Parish of BossierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Robinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Crow v. RoaneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.