Legal Opinion

Baumann v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 15, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the justice of the Third District Court in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, P. J.

The plaintiffs have recovered a verdict of $202.10, for injuries to a horse and truck sustained in a collision with the defendant’s cable car, on Lexington avenue, at the intersection of. *659One Hundred and Twenty-sixth, street, on the evening of December II, 1896. The plaintiffs’ truck, drawn by two horses, in charge of their driver, proceeded up Lexington avenue on the defendant’s up-town track, behind a north-bound car, at a distance from the latter, variously testified to be from five feet to a wagon’s length. The driver intended to proceed to plaintiffs’ stable on One Hundred and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heaney v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Hamilton v. Third Avenue RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
  3. Fogassi v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rissler v. St. Louis Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Curtin v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
  3. Goodman v. West Chicago St. R. R.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API