Legal Opinion
Blood v. Poindexter
Indiana Tax Court
Decided June 6, 1988No. 26T05-8803-TA-00012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FISHER, Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the opposing motions of the parties. The Department has filed a motion requesting this Court to assert exclusive jurisdiction over this cause. Blood has countered by filing a motion to strike the Department's motion asserting that this Court does not have jurisdiction. 1
The Department contends that this Court has exclusive jurisdiction under IC 33-3-5-2 because the case arises under the tax laws of the State and the appeal is of a final determination made by the Department. Blood contends that no final determination has been made by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lloyd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Payne, President v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue, Gross Income Tax DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Herff Jones, Inc. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Tax Court · 1987
3Cited by4 opinions
- Scheid v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Tax Court · 1990
- Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1991
- Developmental Services Alternatives, Inc. v. Indiana Family & Social Services AdministrationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Development Serv. v. Ind. Fam. Soc. Serv.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009