Legal Opinion

Reed v. Harter Chair Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 1994PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Casey, J.

On a prior appeal, we modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff by reversing so much thereof as included a lump-sum award for future damages in excess of $250,000 and remitted the matter to Supreme Court to fashion the structured payment as required by CPLR 5041 (185 AD2d 547, 550). The resulting judgment structured by Supreme Court directed the immediate payment to plaintiff of the following lump sums: $56,452 in past damages, $250,000 in future damages, $18,817 in counsel fees on the past damages award and $83,333 in counsel fees on the lump-sum future damages…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rohring v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Ursini v. SussmanNew York Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Peterson v. ZuercherNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Brown v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Peterson v. ZuercherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Caruso v. Russell P. LeFrois Builders, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Bermeo v. Yucel AtakentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Hegarty v. BalleeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Silvestri v. SmallbergNew York Supreme Court · 1995
  5. LeFevre v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API