Legal Opinion

Mathieson v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 31, 1973No. 1 CA-IC 731Published

1Opinion of the Court

HAIRE, Judge.

On this review of an award entered by the respondent Commission in a workmen’s compensation proceeding, the petitioning workman contends that an injury to his shoulder which left him with a residual impairment constituting a 20% functional loss of use of the left arm should have been treated as an unscheduled disability. We have reviewed the record and find that the evidence supports the scheduled award entered by the Commission. See Arnott v. Industrial Commission, 103 Ariz. 182, 438 P.2d 419 (1968); Bradley v. Industrial Commission, 13 Ariz.App. 204, 475 P.2d 296 (1970);…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arnott v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Heredia v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  3. Pena v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Bradley v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API