Legal Opinion
Keating v. Nordstrom, Inc.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided October 23, 2019No. 3:17-cv-00030Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA MAUREEN KEATING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NORDSTROM, INC., Case No. 3:17-cv-00030-SLG Defendant. ORDER RE MOTION FOR THE COURT TO DETERMINE THE SUFFICIENCY OF RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION AND MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSE OR IMPOSE OTHER DISCOVERY SANCTIONS Before the Court at Docket 193 is Plaintiffs’ Motion for the Court to Determine the Sufficiency of Responses and Objections to Requests for Admission and Motion to Compel Further Response or Impose Other Discovery Sanctions. Defendant Nordstrom, Inc.,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kevin F. Marchand v. Mercy Medical Center, an Idaho Corporation, and Neil K. Farris, D.O.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Milgram Food Stores, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1983
- S.A. Healy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997