Legal Opinion · Dissent

John E. Kirkendall v. Department of the Army

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 22, 2005No. 05-3077Published

1DissentDyk, Circuit Judge

The majority today holds with respect to the VEOA appeal that when Congress said “in no event may any ... appeal be brought ... later than 15 days,” it did not really mean “in no event.” With respect to the USERRA claim the majority gives “appeal” a different meaning than the well established meaning of that term. I respectfully dissent.

In my view, the Board should be affirmed both on the VEOA claim and on the USERRA claim. Kirkendall has failed to bring his VEOA appeal within 15 days as required by 5 U.S.C. § 3330a(d)(l)(B), and (since the USERRA proceeding is not an appeal) he is not…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API