Legal Opinion

ITT Hartford Insurance Group v. Nicholls

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 2, 1994No. WCB 91-01349; CA A77429Published

1Per curiam

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that the Board did not have jurisdiction to determine whether chiropractic care that claimant had received was approved by claimant’s attending physician and whether the treatment was palliative or curative.1

We recently held that a dispute over whether medical treatment that has already been received is palliative or curative is a matter covered by ORS 656.327(1), which, under Meyers v. Darigold, Inc., 123 Or App 217, 861 P2d 352 (1993), the Board may resolve as long as no party has sought review by the director of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meyers v. Darigold, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Theodore v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API