Legal Opinion
Panaggio v. Panaggio
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 31, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion for a protective order. Plaintiff failed to establish “the requisite legitimate factual predicate’ for the discovery sought and there is no basis to depart from the general rule that financial disclosure is inappropriate unless and until the existing separation agreement is set aside” (Krehling v Krehling, 190 AD2d 1039, 1040; see also, Fakiris v Fakiris, 177 AD2d 540, 543; cf., Gilsten v Gilsten, 137 AD2d 411, 413). The court also properly granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fakiris v. FakirisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Gloor v. GloorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Reader v. ReaderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Gilsten v. GilstenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Krehling v. KrehlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dwyer v. DwyerNew York Supreme Court · 2001
- CNB Bank v. New Creation Fellowship of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
- Michael Rodger BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Michael Rodger BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2020