Legal Opinion

Willcox v. Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 28, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the defendants, Elenterio Perez and another, from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of Hew York.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaynor, J. :

This is not an action on the chattel mortgage, but for a deficiency thereon after foreclosure and sale. Therefore section 139 of the Municipal Court Act,* that no action shall be brought in that court *694on a chattel mortgage “ made to secure the purchase price of chattels ” does not apply. It is true- that there is the usual provision in the mortgage that the mortgagor shall be liable for such deficiency, but that is not what makes him liable; he would be liable if there were no such provision ; his liability arises as matter of law out of the foreclosure, and that is the foundation…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the PeopleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API