Legal Opinion
Murff v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided November 25, 1914No. 3271Published
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
on rehearing.
December 31, 1914.
DAVIDSON, Judge.
On a previous day of this term the judgment herein was affirmed, the writer dissenting. Motion for rehearing calls in review the correctness of the majority opinion. The writer believed at the time of the affirmance that it should not have occurred, and a more careful review has more thoroughly convinced him of the correctness of his original opinion. As Judge Harper, after having investigated the matters involved, has arrived at the same conclusion, I proceed to briefly give the reasons why the motion for rehearing should be granted, and desire…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Coffey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Gelston v. HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
- Cooper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Mathis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- United States v. McKeeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1877
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.