Legal Opinion

State v. Noriega

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 17, 1996No. 1 CA-CR 94-0474PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULT, Judge.

Pedro Noriega, Jr. (“defendant”) appeals his convictions and sentences, contending that the trial court erred by refusing to give his requested jury instruction concerning mere presence. Because we conclude that the instruction should have been given, we reverse the judgments of conviction and remand for a new trial.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Defendant was charged by indictment with four counts of threatening or intimidating. These offenses were charged as class four felonies because of the additional allegation that they were committed to promote, further, or assist the interests…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. PortilloArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. McNairArizona Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. DoerrArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. KarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. State v. PrasertphongArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. BayardiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. State v. Rosas-HernandezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API