Legal Opinion

Francis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 10, 1964No. 64-168PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant suffered an order denying his petition for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix and appeals to this Court. The petition presented two grounds for relief; (1) No preliminary hearing was held prior to his trial; (2) His privately employed counsel did not competently represent him.

The trial judge correctly denied the petition. The failure to hold a preliminary hearing is not of itself enough to show lack of due process. Wooten v. State, Fla. App.1964, 163 So.2d 305. Furthermore, the mere allegation that defendant’s counsel did not competently represent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. Wooten v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crusoe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  2. Dancy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  3. Crusoe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Porter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API