Legal Opinion

Runimas v. Howe

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 18, 1981No. 79-2166PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA

Kvirinas Runimas (hereinafter plaintiff) and his wife, Elena Runimas, brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries they sustained in a vehicular accident. The jury returned a verdict against defendants, Gregory J. Howe and Richard’s Motor Service, Inc., in favor of plaintiff for $70,000 and in favor of Elena for $60,000. The jury also answered a special interrogatory to the effect that plaintiff was in the exercise of ordinary care at the time of the accident. The trial court entered judgment on the verdicts and denied defendants’ post-trial motions. Defendants have satisfied…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Pennington v. McLeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  3. McHenry Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. RueckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. Neurohr v. RichmondAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  5. Quigley v. CrawfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Knight v. HaydaryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Bausback v. K Mart Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API