Legal Opinion

State v. Arnold

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 11, 1972No. 20213PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

Defendant appeals from conviction of attempted grand larceny. Former ORS 164.310. He was indicted for larceny over $75, tried by a jury, and found guilty of the attempt. His assignments of error are: (1) there was insufficient evidence for conviction; (2) a police officer’s testimony that defendant relied on his constitutional right to remain silent when questioned should not have been admitted; (3) (a) that he was not advised of his right to have counsel present during questioning and (b) he was not advised that he could stop answering questions at any time, as required by Miranda v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. GannOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. AventOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Criswell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. M.A.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. MAB v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  4. Rigterink v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  5. Rigterink v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API