Legal Opinion

Therrien v. Maine Employment Security Commission

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 23, 1977PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODFREY, Justice.

Appellees claim unemployment benefits under the Maine Employment Security Law, chapter 13 of title 26 of our statutes. Employed as spinners by appellant First Hartford Corporation in its Wyandotte Mill, they were asked to volunteer in what the company proposed as a trial program to determine whether one spinner could efficiently run three frames rather than two as had been the standard practice in the mill.

A frame is a long machine holding seven overhead spools each of which continuously generates twenty-four spinning threads. The job of the spinner is to patrol each frame on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Toothaker v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Moore v. Maine Department of Manpower Affairs, Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. Tobin v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Dotter v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. Paige v. Maine Employment Security CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  5. Sheink v. Maine Department of Manpower AffairsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API