Legal Opinion
United States v. Havelock
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 23, 2010No. 08-10472PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge CANBY; Dissent by Judge GRABER.
OPINION
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Kurt William Havelock appeals his jury conviction of six counts of mailing threatening communications in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 876(e), which makes it a felony to mail a communication “addressed to any other person and containing ... any threat to injure the person of the addressee or of another.” Havelock argues, among other things, that the packets he mailed do not come within this statute because on their faces they were addressed to media corporations or other media organizations rather than individual persons.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. James TwineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Maney v. KagenveamaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. HavelockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. RendelmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Charles ChastainCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. HavelockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. HavelockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.