State v. Holden
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BRETT, Judge.
This is an appeal by the State of Oklahoma on a reserved question of law. 22 O.S.1951 § 1053; State v. Waldrep, 80 Okl. Cr. 230, 158 P.2d 368. The state contends that the trial court erred in sustaining the defendant’s demurrer to the evidence on a reckless driving charge and his motion to suppress the evidence on an unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor charge; It asserts further that when officers are justified in stopping a vehicle and arresting the driver and the evidence discloses violation of the prohibition laws, such evidence is admissible to prove violation of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Matthews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
- Nott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- O'Dell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
- State v. WaldrepCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fields v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973