Legal Opinion

United States v. Marcos Soto-Mendoza

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 25, 2016No. 14-10219, 14-10220UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

After a jury trial, the district court entered judgment and sentenced Marcos Soto-Mendoza on five counts of bringing illegal aliens into the United States for profit. Soto-Mendoza appeals from his judgment of conviction, raising several different claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

The district court did not err in refusing to order a new trial. On Count I, the jury responded to a special interrogatory by finding the government had not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Soto-Mendoza acted for financial gain or commercial advantage. Even assuming…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Samuel Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Daniels v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Yuami Yoshida, AKA Yuami IsogaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Arturo Garcia-CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API