United States v. Marcos Soto-Mendoza
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
After a jury trial, the district court entered judgment and sentenced Marcos Soto-Mendoza on five counts of bringing illegal aliens into the United States for profit. Soto-Mendoza appeals from his judgment of conviction, raising several different claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.
The district court did not err in refusing to order a new trial. On Count I, the jury responded to a special interrogatory by finding the government had not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Soto-Mendoza acted for financial gain or commercial advantage. Even assuming…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Samuel Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Daniels v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Yuami Yoshida, AKA Yuami IsogaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Arturo Garcia-CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018