Legal Opinion
Winston v. City of New York
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 29, 1984No. 82 Civ. 1847PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
The plaintiffs in this suit are teachers presently or formerly employed by the defendant Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York (“Board of Education”), or one of its component community school districts. They are challenging a provision of State law, codified in Section B20-38.0 of the New York City Administrative Code, that provides that New York public school teachers who are dismissed for cause are ineligible to receive City-funded retirement benefits. All parties to the action have moved for summary judgment,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Winston v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Winston v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985