Legal Opinion

Lyon v. Lyon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1900No. Appeal, No. 183PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 183, Jan. T., 1898, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Centre Co., Jan. T., 1896, No. 165, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of Rose Sternberg Lyon v. Gustave Lyon. Trespass to recover damages for the alienation of a husband’s affections. Before Love, P. J. At the trial it appeared that on December 26, 1893, plaintiff married Moyer Lyon, a younger brother of the defendant.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 183, Jan. T., 1898, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Centre Co., Jan. T., 1896, No. 165, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of Rose Sternberg Lyon v. Gustave Lyon. Trespass to recover damages for the alienation of a husband’s affections. Before Love, P. J. At the trial it appeared that on December 26, 1893, plaintiff married Moyer Lyon, a younger brother of the defendant. Gustave Lyon resided in Philadelphia, and his brother, Moyer, was the manager of a store in Bellefonte which was apparently owned by Gustave. The evidence for the plaintiff tended to show that as soon as…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice McCollum,

This is a suit in which the plaintiff charges the defendant with having alienated the affections of her husband, and thus accomplished his abandonment of her. The answer of the defendant to the charge is that no word or act of his at any time, caused or contributed to the alienation complained of, and that on discovering the husband’s purpose to abandon his wife he did all in his power to prevent the execution of it. The issue thus made required the jury to determine it upon the relevant and competent testimony in the case. If error appeared in the admission of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grove v. Widney, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API