Legal Opinion

Sharpensteen v. Pearce

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 28, 1952No. 4-9655PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is a suit brought by the appellee for breach of a contract for the purchase of chickens. The appellant, as defendant below, admitted having agreed to buy the chickens, but he contended that some of the birds had contracted colds before delivery and that by a trade usage in the industry the buyer is not required to accept diseased fowl. The trial court refused to permit the defendant to prove this trade usage, and upon the other evidence there was a verdict for the plaintiff for the difference between the price the defendant agreed to pay and the price at which the plaintiff later sold…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Midland Valley Railroad v. LemoyneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Ben F. Levis, Inc. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. TXO Production Corp. v. Page Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Precision Steel Warehouse, Inc. v. Anderson-Martin MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Forest Park Canning Co. v. ColerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  4. Venturi, Inc. v. AdkissonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  5. Johnson v. DanielsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API