Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Estate of Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 1983Published

1Dissent

Niehoff, J. (dissenting).

For centuries Americans have properly believed that they have the legally protected right, with some few exceptions not applicable here, to will their property to whomever they wish. Today our court holds that notwithstanding the fact that Mr. Johnson, the testator here, had such right, and that it was perfectly legal for him to have chosen the beneficiaries he did, he lost or forfeited that right, and that the court has the power and right to rewrite the will in a way which will enable others not designated as objects of his bounty to share in his estate.

Why is that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Civil Rights CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API