Commonwealth v. Pichardo
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, C.J.
A Superior Court jury found the defendant guilty *297of second degree murder. Because of the trial judge’s erroneous instruction regarding the third method of proving malice, the jury may have found malice on a lower level of proof than required by law.1 Therefore, the conviction must be reversed and a new trial held.
The jury could have found the following facts beyond a reasonable doubt. At around midnight on July 21, 1993, the defendant, Jason Nault, Ramon Romero, Rudolpho Casado, and others were involved in a fight with Dennis Dietrich, the victim, during which Dietrich used the epithet,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WelanskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Commonwealth v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. GreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Commonwealth v. SiresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. FordhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AzarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. HaddockMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. Zane Z.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Commonwealth v. RileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.