Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pichardo

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 13, 1998No. 96-P-1784PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, C.J.

A Superior Court jury found the defendant guilty *297of second degree murder. Because of the trial judge’s erroneous instruction regarding the third method of proving malice, the jury may have found malice on a lower level of proof than required by law.1 Therefore, the conviction must be reversed and a new trial held.

The jury could have found the following facts beyond a reasonable doubt. At around midnight on July 21, 1993, the defendant, Jason Nault, Ramon Romero, Rudolpho Casado, and others were involved in a fight with Dennis Dietrich, the victim, during which Dietrich used the epithet,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WelanskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Commonwealth v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. GreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. SiresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. FordhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AzarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. HaddockMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. Zane Z.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. RileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API