Dravo Doyle Co. v. Sulzberger & Sons Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edmund K. Jarecki, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
2. Sales, § 252*—when implied warranty of fitness for purpose exists. Where an article is to be made or supplied to the order of a vendee, there is an implied warranty of the fitness of the article for the special purpose designated- by vendee if known to vendor. 3. Sales, § 387*—when buyer may keep property and sue for breach of warranty. Where there is a sale and delivery of personal property with an express or implied warranty, the purchaser may keep and use the property if found to be defective and bring an action for breach of warranty. 4. Sales, § 389*—when purchaser may recoup damages…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Lutgert v. SchaefleinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
- Gifford-Wood Co. v. Western Fuel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1918