Legal Opinion

State v. McKAGUE

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 2011No. 85657-5PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Per curiam

¶1 Jay McKague appealed his conviction for second degree assault, and the Court of Appeals affirmed in a split decision. We affirm the Court of Appeals’ holding that substantial evidence supported the conviction, but in doing so we disapprove of the definition of “substantial bodily harm” applied by the Court of Appeals majority.

¶2 McKague shoplifted a can of smoked oysters from Kee Ho Chang’s convenience store. Chang followed McKague out of the store and confronted him in the parking lot. When McKague tried to leave, Chang grabbed his sweat shirt. McKague punched Chang in the head several…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of LaveryWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In Re Personal Restraint of LaveryWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. ThiefaultWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. ThiefaultWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. RichWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. WitherspoonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. WitherspoonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. State v. OzunaWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. CatonWashington Supreme Court · 2012

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API