Legal Opinion
Fishencord v. Peterson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 10, 1935No. 25322PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
This action was commenced by the plaintiffs, Herman F. Fishen-cord and Blanch Fishencord, in the district court of Muskogee county, on the 16th day of February, 1933, against Carr Peterson and Cleat Peterson and the First National Bank of Haskell, defendants, and they will be referred to as such herein. The cause was finally heard on the second amended petition as amended under the direction of the trial court on the hearing of demurrers. The petition consists of three causes of action. It is very prolix, covering, with the amendments directed by the trial court, some 28 pages of the record.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gardner v. . OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Stone v. CaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- State Ex Rel. Schilling v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Bryan v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Hutchings v. ZumbrunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Reeves v. AgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. CloudmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- BERKSON v. STATE ex rel. ASKINS AS ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COURTSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
- Fishencord v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- BERKSON v. STATE ex rel. ASKINS AS ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COURTSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.