Legal Opinion

Dean v. Maxwell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1963No. 37836Published

1Per curiam

Petitioner’s primary contention is that the failure of the trial court to appoint counsel to act on his behalf prior to arraignment deprived him of the right to enter certain pleas and defenses. He claims that the right to urge such pleas and defenses was lost to him when he entered the plea of not guilty, and that, subsequently, the entering of such pleas was not a matter of right but a matter of the unreviewable discretion of the trial court, and thus petitioner was denied the right to a fair trial.

Petitioner urges as authority for his position the case of Hamilton v. Alabama, 368 U. S.,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Rohn v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Reeves v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  5. Morrell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API