Legal Opinion
Cunningham Bros. v. Bail
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 10, 1969No. 17113PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASTLE, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff brings this appeal from the district court’s dismissal of its three-count complaint filed against the individual and corporate defendants under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201.1 Plaintiff had contracted as general contractor to construct a building for Moore Business Forms, Inc., at Charleston, Illinois. Defendant, Davidson Masonry and Restoration, Inc., was engaged by plaintiff as the masonry subcontractor for the job, and the individual defendants were employees of Davidson .who were injured when the platform on which they were standing collapsed.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- E. Edelmann & Co. v. Triple-A Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cunningham Brothers, Inc. v. Harry BailCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- MacMillan-Bloedel, Inc. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of NewarkDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1983
- Karsjens v. JessonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- United Insurance Co. of America v. HarrisDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
- Institute for Studies Abroad Inc. v. International Studies Abroad Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.