Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Hooper

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 23, 1970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranchfield, J.

This is an action brought to condemn, for highway purposes, certain real property owned by the defendants Hooper, hereafter referred to as the defendants. After a verdict and judgment, the Highway Commission has appealed, claiming that the trial court erred in excluding certain testimony offered by the plaintiff, in admitting certain testimony offered by the defendants and in failing to give certain requested instructions. The basic question presented by the plaintiff’s assignments of error is the method of valuation to be used in determining just compensation when the parcel being taken is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State v. MeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Territory of Hawaii v. AdelmeyerHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Travis County v. TrogdonTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  5. State Highway Commission v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Orofino v. SwayneIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State Highway Commission v. HooperOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State Highway Commission v. HooperOregon Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API